MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1497542279 · doi:10.4271/2008-01-2671

Ride Dynamic Analysis of a Hybrid Discrete and Continuous Vehicle Model

2008· article· en· W1497542279 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVehicle dynamicsAutomotive engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="htmlview paragraph">In this study the dynamic analysis of the vehicle system modeled as a hybrid discrete and continuous system has been investigated. The discrete system modeling has formed the traditional ride dynamic analysis model for vehicle systems. In such a model the chassis is assumed as a discrete block attached to different degrees of freedom that can account for the unsprung masses, engine and driver among many others. However, this model cannot accommodate all the aspects of a chassis which is strictly a continuous system. In the present study the chassis is assumed as a flexible beam on which a pair of single degree of freedom systems is added to account for the engine and driver. Moreover, the beam is mounted on a couple of spring-damper elements that simulate the suspension of the vehicle which results in a combination of continuous and discrete systems. In order to solve this problem, the assumed mode method has been employed using the mode shapes of a free-free beam. The method is applied on a city bus and the natural frequencies of the undamped system were calculated. Further, the frequency responses for ground and engine excitations were obtained. The method is validated by comparing the results with those obtained by finite element method where the beam is meshed as a continuous system while all other DOF were assumed as lumped masses connected to the chassis with spring damper elements.</div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it