Introduction: New Direction in Twentieth-Century Argentine Political History
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Argentina, the March 1976 coup d’état is a conceptual fulcrum. Historianshave neatly divided Argentina’s political, social, and cultural pasts as post- andpre-coup. There is a more compelling derivative, though, of that linear break. Whatthe proceso means—how it is understood together with its consequences—keepsshifting, like the disturbing physical breaks in the urban geography of a futuristicBuenos Aires portrayed in novelist Ricardo Piglia’s La ciudad ausente. In part,changing understandings of what the proceso means to past and present complementsArgentina’s unusual relationship with its dictatorial past. With the fall ofauthoritarian rule in 1983, Argentina was the first country in the region to forma truth commission to search for answers into the how and why of murderousdictatorship. It was also the first to bring to trial, convict and imprison militaryleaders for crimes committed as heads of state—this while dictatorships stillfunctioned in 1980s Paraguay and Chile just next door.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".