MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1497847348 · doi:10.18433/j3d02f

INTRODUCTION - Mechanism-based Development of Natural Products for Human Health

2013· article· en· W1497847348 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMedicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainstreamNatural (archaeology)Product (mathematics)Engineering ethicsPharmacyMechanism (biology)Drug developmentBusinessTraditional medicineMedicineEngineeringPolitical sciencePharmacologyDrugGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Special Issue of the Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences arises from an inaugural conference on “Mechanism-Based Natural Product Development” held at Whistler Mountain, Canada on September 21-22, 2012.
 The aim of the conference was to bring together scientists from various disciplines to discuss the development of new therapeutic products from natural medicines based on mechanistic and related scientific studies. It provided an opportunity to explore new directions in natural medicine research and development, with the ultimate objective of leading to greater integration of natural and conventional synthetic pharmaceutical medicines for the health of the community worldwide.
 
 The concept for this conference and the Special Issue has come from the growing interest internationally in traditional and natural medicinal health products in recent years. It may, at first, appear surprising that developed countries are re-embracing natural product research and development. There are of course many reasons for this, including growing community interest in natural products providing improved health and wellbeing, the growing difficulty and cost of maintaining a pipeline of effective and, above all, safe new products for chronic diseases in the mainstream pharmaceutical industry, and the knowledge that many of our small drug pharmaceutical medicines have come from plants and other organisms. But as traditional natural product medicines increasingly enter the mainstream, the call for evidence to support their use also grows louder. Essential to the acceptance of natural medicines are the validation of their traditional uses and identification, isolation and structural characterization of their active components, together with the elucidation of their mechanisms of biological action, adverse effects, and identification of their molecular targets. These requirements provide the focus of this Special Issue.
 
 Scientific investigation and development of new health products requires the joining together of many disciplines, including chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacognosy and cell and molecular biology, as well as integration with clinical medicine. Natural product medicines are expected to be multi-component and multi-targeted. Are they effective, safe and properly standardized in their existing formulations? Are there opportunities to isolate single active components for standardization and conventional drug discovery and development? Answering these questions requires collaboration between scientific disciplines focused on a common goal.
 
 In line with the aims of the conference, the Special Issue has incorporated review and original research articles related to mechanisms of action in a number of therapeutic areas, mostly from invited speakers at the Whistler conference. Other articles were unsolicited submissions to the Journal that satisfy the scope of the issue. Articles range from reports on efforts to work with traditional owners in the appropriate cultural context, to develop new therapeutics based on traditional literature, to discover new medicinal products, to develop new pharmaceuticals based on the isolation of active chemical components, to develop new methods of delivery, and to identify mechanisms of action. The medical 'territory' includes cancer, heart disease, diabetes and related chronic inflammatory diseases, pain pathways, deafness and infertility. Other articles investigate the quality and safety of products by the application of current analytical methods, the potential for interactions of natural products (e.g., cranberry) with pharmaceutical medicines and the variability of a selection of similar natural product medicines with regard to their contents of therapeutically beneficial and marker compounds, as claimed on the product labels. In addition, the issue includes the abstracts of posters that formed an important part of the conference, especially from postgraduate students and postdoctoral fellows. These are included as Proceedings.
 
 We are indebted to the scientists who willingly gave their time and resources to attend the Whistler conference and, in many cases, submitted manuscripts for inclusion in this Special Issue. The delegates and contributors came from many places, near and far, to make this inaugural conference on mechanism-based natural product development a success. 
 
 Such a conference and the subsequent proceedings in the Special issue are not possible without the work of many. We thank the organizing and scientific committee for their support and valuable suggestions. A conference of this scope would not be possible without sponsorship; this includes especially the National Health Products Research Society of Canada, the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences and several Universities. Major support, without program or editorial input, was provided by SOHO Flordis International (SFI). We commend them for believing in the quest for clinically proven and research-based products based on an understanding of underlying mechanisms. The support of Purapharm International is also gratefully acknowledged.
 
 We would like to dedicate this Special Issue to Professor Allan SY Lau of the University of Hong Kong, who contributed enthusiastically to the organization of the conference and its program, but was ultimately unable to attend due to his untimely passing. Professor Lau was a pioneer in the integration of natural and orthodox medical studies and his inspiration will be greatly missed.
 
 Basil D Roufogalis, Arthur D Conigrave and Emanuel E Strehler
 Co-Guest Editors

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it