MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1497959562 · doi:10.7202/007895ar

Une loi contre la pauvreté : la nouvelle approche québécoise de lutte contre la pauvreté et l’exclusion sociale

2004· article· fr· W1497959562 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Alain Noël

Bibliographic record

VenueLien social et Politiques · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le 12 juin 2002, le gouvernement du Québec rendait public un projet de loi visant à lutter contre la pauvreté et l’exclusion sociale. Le projet de loi 112 fait de la lutte contre la pauvreté une priorité gouvernementale et il engage le gouvernement à mettre en place des plans d’action spécifiques et des structures institutionnelles pour assurer le suivi de ces plans. La loi s’accompagne également d’une stratégie gouvernementale relativement ambitieuse de lutte contre la pauvreté. L’article présente le projet de loi et la stratégie, en insistant sur les origines citoyennes du projet et sur ses implications pour la démocratisation du social. Le projet a le mérite de mettre la lutte contre la pauvreté à l’avant-plan et d’être conçu dans une perspective longitudinale, intégrée et participative. Mais il demeure pour l’instant relativement abstrait. Seul le temps nous dira si cette ouverture significative donnera des résultats importants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0140.013
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLien social et PolitiquesSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207