Une scénographie républicaine au féminin : La confession d’une jeune fille de George Sand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
D’aucuns ont reproché à George Sand de ne pas s’être ralliée à l’action féministe au cours de la Révolution de 1848 ni à la lutte ouvrière sous la Commune de 1871. Si elle ne radicalise pas son républicanisme, elle table en revanche sur le pouvoir subversif de postures en marge de l’ordre établi. Elle met à l’épreuve la doxa dans des récits qui confrontent le discours misogyne et contre-révolutionnaire avec des paroles de marginaux (femmes, artistes), où la mise en cause des valeurs bourgeoises appelle des changements sociopolitiques. De ce point de vue, un roman tel La confession d’une jeune fille, paru six ans avant l’avènement de la iiie République, témoigne d’une écriture négociant son rapport à la doxa selon un dispositif d’énonciation qui établit un contrat de lecture républicain avec un lectorat de plus en plus démocratisé, et ce, dans l’entre-deux stratégique de la norme bourgeoise et de la culture révolutionnaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".