MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1498163081 · doi:10.4000/crcv.10300

Le jardin d’Éden : le paradis terrestre renouvellé dans le jardin de la Reine à Trianon de Pierre-Joseph Buc’hoz

2012· article· fr· W1498163081 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gabriela Lamy

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin du Centre de recherche du château de Versailles · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pierre-Joseph Buc’hoz (Metz, 1731 – Paris, 1807), médecin botaniste attaché à la maison de Monsieur, frère de Louis XVI, publia de 1783 à 1785 deux cent soixante gravures de plantes (dont soixante jacinthes et tulipes) acclimatées et cultivées dans les jardins de la reine à Trianon. Du cap de Bonne-Espérance à la Guyane, de la Chine au Canada, de l’Afrique à la Sibérie, des voyageurs rapportaient alors graines et plantes que les jardiniers Richard père et fils acclimataient dans les serres chaudes de Trianon situées à l’emplacement du jardin anglais actuel dans le domaine de Versailles. Buc’hoz, déjà vivement critiqué de son vivant et qualifié au xixe siècle de « miserabilimus compilator », a publié un très grand nombre d’ouvrages d’histoire naturelle dont plusieurs in-folio. Très proche de la cour, il fut un véritable chroniqueur des faits scientifiques et botaniques des princes qu’il avait le privilège de côtoyer. Ainsi Le jardin d’Éden : le paradis terrestre renouvellé dans le jardin de la Reine à Trianon met en scène les voyageurs, botanistes, médecins, princes et mécènes qui ont permis de constituer dans les jardins de Trianon une collection botanique méconnue et oubliée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin du Centre de recherche du château de VersaillesSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207