MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1498172811 · doi:10.3917/crii.021.0079

Le café et l'ashram

2003· article· fr· W1498172811 on OpenAlex
Susanne Hoeber Rudolph, Lloyd I. Rudolph

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritique internationale · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian History and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceEthnologyArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les concepts d’espace public et de société civile sont profondément enracinés dans le monde anglo-américain. Il est néanmoins possible de les transposer dans le contexte indien, où l’ashram gandhien peut en être considéré comme une variante locale. Bien sûr, la dimension religieuse de l’ashram est contraire au rationalisme des Lumières, mais la vertu civique, la recherche du bien commun et d’une société juste mis en avant par Gandhi dans ses ashrams présentent des caractéristiques identiques aux concepts d’espace public et de société civile. Finalement, la différence principale réside dans la relation à l’Etat. Tandis que la vision occidentale de l’espace public suppose que l’Etat appliquera les mesures qui auront émergé du débat, dans la vision de Gandhi, l’Etat est supposé trop faible pour le faire. Le changement social doit être soutenu par la transformation intérieure de l’individu, de son comportement et de sa vision du monde.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it