MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1498303427 · doi:10.1080/15504260902869311

Exploiting Nicotinic Receptor Mechanisms for the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Depression

2009· article· en· W1498303427 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Woznica, Tony P. George

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dual Diagnosis · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNicotinic agonistNicotineMajor depressive disorderSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)VareniclinePsychiatryPsychologyPopulationSmoking cessationAddictionMedicineNeurosciencePharmacologyReceptorCognitionInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smoking rates are higher in persons with schizophrenia (SZ; 58%–88%) and major depressive disorder (MDD; 40%–60%) compared to the U.S. general population (∼23%). Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are the brain receptors for nicotine. SZ and MDD are nicotine-responsive neuropsychiatric disorders. Thus, it is hypothesized that the higher rates of smoking in the SZ and MDD populations can be attributed to the pathophysiology of these disorders. Knowledge of nAChR functioning can be exploited in therapeutics for treating both the addiction and clinical aspects of these disorders. This article reviews the neurobiology of nAChR and biological dysregulation inherent in SZ and MDD. In addition, manipulation of nAChRs with appropriate agonists and antagonists is discussed. Specifically, nAChRs can be stimulated to improve cognitive deficits associated with SZ and blocked for the treatment of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor–refractory major depression; a combination of agonism and antagonism may assist with smoking cessation in SZ populations. This knowledge has significant implications for further development of pharmacotherapies for treatment of SZ and MDD symptoms and for smoking cessation in these disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.330
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dual DiagnosisSame topicNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyFrench-language works237,207