MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1498366914 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab22

22 PRODUCTION OF A CLONED CALF USING KIDNEY CELLS OBTAINED FROM A 48-HOUR COOLED CARCASS

2004· article· en· W1498366914 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrypsinizationSomatic cell nuclear transferAndrologyBiologyCytochalasin BCell cultureAnatomyMolecular biologyAnimal scienceChemistryEmbryoBlastocystCellBiochemistryTrypsinEmbryogenesisCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability to produce cloned livestock using postmortem tissue could incorporate an additional application into the field of nuclear transfer. This study examined the feasibility of producing cloned cattle using a primary cell line established from a postmortem beef carcass. A market beef heifer processed at a USDA-certified slaughterhouse was used to develop a primary somatic cell line. Tissue samples were taken from the kidney and forelimb regions either 1) immediately following slaughter (fresh) or 2) 48 h postslaughter (cooled) where the carcass was housed at 2 to 4°C. Tissue was removed and placed on ice in PBS + 5.0% (v:v) penicillin/streptomycin. A primary culture was established using standard techniques and cultured in supplemented DMEM F-12 medium. Once established, cells were trypsinized and either frozen or continually passaged. Cells used for nuclear transfer (NT) were passaged (48 h before use) and cultured with 15 µM roscovitine roughly 24 h prior to nuclear transfer. Cells were approximately 80% confluent and between passage numbers 1 and 11 at the time of NT. Selected slaughterhouse-derived oocytes were matured in supplemented TCM 199 medium for 18–20 h at 39°C in 5.0% CO2 and air. Mature Metaphase II oocytes were vortexed and stained with Hoechst 33342 to help with chromatin removal. Following enucleation, roscovitine-treated carcass cells were placed in the perivitelline space of the oocyte. Reconstructed NT embryos were fused in Zimmermann’s medium and pulsed using needle-like electrodes. This was followed by activation using a combination of calcium ionophore (5 µM), cytochalasin D (5 µg mL-1), and cycloheximide (10 µg mL-1) in TCM + 10% FBS. Fused NT embryos were cultured in 50-µL drops of BARC medium (USDA, Beltsville, MD) for 7 days at 39°C in a 5% CO2, 5% O2 and 90% N2 environment. Embryo development for all four groups (Table 1) was assessed with blastocysts (grade 1 or 2) being transferred into recipient cows 7 days post-estrus. Cleavage rates were not significantly different between groups, and the use of either fresh or cooled cells did not impact blastocyst formation. However, there was a significant difference (P = 0.05) in % blastocyst based on the source of the donor cell. Overall, one live calf resulted from 34 transferred NTs produced using kidney cells taken from a 48 h cooled carcass. These results display the feasibility of producing cloned calves from cells collected post mortem, which ultimately could be used as a tool to select breeding bulls based on their own steer carcass characteristics. Table 1 Embryo development and pregnancy data for the production of beef carcass clones

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it