MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1498439782 · doi:10.1109/acc.2015.7171130

Explicit/multi-parametric model predictive control of dissipative distributed parameter systems

2015· article· en· W1498439782 on OpenAlexaff
Liu Liu, Biao Huang, Stevan Dubljević

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissipative systemParametric statisticsDistributed parameter systemModel predictive controlApplied mathematicsPartial differential equationMathematicsPiecewiseQuadratic equationRepresentation (politics)Parabolic partial differential equationControl theory (sociology)Affine transformationMathematical optimizationComputer scienceMathematical analysisControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work focuses on the development of an explicit/multi-parametric model predictive control algorithm to stabilize the discrete infinite-dimensional system arising from the discrete state space modeling of certain class of dissipative distributed parameter systems, specifically, parabolic partial differential equation (PDE) systems. In particular, the class of parabolic PDEs that captures a large number of transport-reaction systems yields a discrete modal representation which captures the dominant dynamics of the parabolic PDE system. The proposed explicit/multi-parametric model predictive control algorithm is constructed in a way that the objective function is concerned with only the low-order modes, while the state constraints involve both the low-order and higher-order modes. The explicit model predictive control problem is solved off-line by dynamic programming and multi-parametric quadratic programming techniques, and the solution is expressed as a piecewise affine function with its corresponding critical regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.793

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207