MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Peak Systolic Velocities May Be Falsely Low in Young Patients with Erectile Dysfunction

2006· article· en· W1498641754 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineErectile dysfunctionPapaverineIntracavernous injectionProstaglandin E1Sexual stimulationPhentolamineProspective cohort studyUrologyPenisInternal medicineSurgeryStimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Introduction of duplex ultrasonography with color flow Doppler analysis after intracavernous injection of vasoactive drugs has been reported to be a minimally invasive and accurate method, and considered the gold-standard technique for evaluating penile hemodynamics. However, several studies have demonstrated that in some cases Color Doppler Ultrasound (CDU) testing may result in wrong diagnosis because of anxiety and increased sympathetic stimulation. AIM: This study was carried out to evaluate the impact of age on the decision to repeat CDU in patients with initial low peak systolic velocities (PSVs). METHODS: This is a prospective study involving 71 patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) who presented to the Department of Andrology, Sexology and Sexually Transmitted Diseases at Cairo University between December 2000 and April 2002. An intracavernous pharmacotest and CDU with prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine was performed. All patients in the study had poor response to intracavernous pharmacotesting and achieved a low PSV (<30 cm/second) during the initial CDU examination. The CDU was repeated 2 weeks later. The 71 patients were grouped into four according to age: group A (20-29 years old) consisted of 11 patients, group B (30-39 years old) consisted of 19 patients, group C (40-49 years old) consisted of 20 patients, and group D (50-59 years old) consisted of 21 patients. RESULTS: The group A patients experienced a statistically significant increase (P < 0.05) in their PSV measurements, which reached normal values in the second CDU. None of the patients of groups B, C, or D experienced any statistically significant change (P > 0.05) in their PSV measurements in the second CDU, which remained below normal values. Also, there was a statistically significant difference between the PSV measurements of group A and the other three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low PSV measurements in young men (less than 30 years old) with ED should be interpreted with caution. The effect of sympathetic overtone because of the environment in the office and anxiety related to penile injection, together with any underlying psychological disturbance, should be taken into consideration during the evaluation of the results of the CDU. Repetition of the CDU is recommended before considering any additional invasive diagnostic or therapeutic modalities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it