MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1498703293 · doi:10.7202/1012099ar

Les collections d’imprimés et les fonds d’archives de banq : des ressources importantes pour l’histoire de la caricature et de la satire graphique québécoises avant 1960

2012· article· fr· W1498703293 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Dominic Hardy

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour toute étude sur l’histoire de la caricature et de la satire graphique au Québec avant 1960, les fonds et les collections de Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (BAnQ) sont d’une richesse exceptionnelle. Ce texte présente les collections d’imprimés et les fonds d’archives utiles à la recherche en deux temps. Nous examinons d’abord les lieux de publication des documents pour faire ressortir les grandes étapes de l’évolution de la pratique caricaturale sur le territoire québécois. Ensuite, nous décrivons deux fonds d’archives pour indiquer comment des corpus très différents, composés de caricatures et d’autres documents, peuvent être utiles aux chercheurs. Premièrement, un fonds de 3600 caricatures originales signées par Albéric Bourgeois (1876-1962), véritable témoignage de l’avènement de la modernité culturelle au xx e siècle. Ensuite, un ensemble de documents associés au peintre Louis Dulongpré (1759-1843) qui montre comment la circulation de caricatures est étroitement liée aux débuts de la vie démocratique de la collectivité. Ainsi, BAnQ est riche de documents divers – originaux et reproductions – qui permettent de voir comment artistes et éditeurs ont été les artisans d’une forme d’expression qui a longtemps été au coeur de polémiques dans la société québécoise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.018
Science and technology studies0.0100.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du QuébecSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207