Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'office de vicaire a la vie consacree est examine dans le cadre du Directoire pour le ministere pastoral des eveques Apostolorum Successores de 2004. L'etude compare l'office avec les provisions paralleles du Directoire pour le ministere pastoral des eveques Ecclesiae Imago de 1973 pour en demontrer le developpement en theorie et en pratique depuis les trente dernieres annees a la lumiere du Code de droit canonique de 1983 et des documents postconciliaires. Les responsabilites du vicaire a la vie consacree exigent- une connaissance des formes de vie consacree presentes dans une eglise particuliere et du droit propre de chaque institut. Le vicaire devra pouvoir exercer une surveillance des nouvelles formes de vie consacree pouvant etre proposees et demandant la l'approbation canonique. Le soin pastoral, tel que les rencontres de l'eveque diocesain avec les superieurs majeurs, la visite de monasteres sui iuris et des maisons de droit diocesain, l'inspection des rapports financiers, la promotion du service apostolique dans le diocese, la proposition de contrats entre le diocese et les religieux pour les oeuvres apostoliques, ainsi que l'assistance canonique aux superieurs majeurs font tous partie des responsabilites du vicaire en tant que representant de l'eveque diocesain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".