MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1498916389

Midwifery: Best Practice: 4

2006· book· en· W1498916389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Entomology and Zoology · 2006
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Issues and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancySection (typography)Caesarean sectionAutonomySociologyGender studiesHistoryPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Acknowledgements SECTION 1 Women and Midwives 1.1 The impact of the establishment of a midwife managed unit on women in a rural setting in England Kim Watts, Diane M Fraser and Fehmidah Munir 1.2 Culture, Control and the Birth Environment Mary Newburn 1.3 Drawing the Line: caesarean sections on demand Natasha Carr 1.4 Searching for autonomy Katherine Pollard 1.5 The risky business of normal birth Jenny Fraser SECTION 2 Focus on . Diversity (1) 2.1 Building bridges: involving Pakistani women Yana Richens 2.2 What's it like to work in Siberia? Rachel Simpkins 2.3 What's it like to work in Ontario? Elizabeth Fulton-Breathat 2.4 Excerpts from a CNM's journal: Kosovo, winter 2000 Barbara Hammes 2.5 Midwifery in Northern Belize Diane B Boyer, Carrie Klima, Judith Jennrich and Jeanne E. Raisler SECTION 3 Pregnancy. Exploring Pregnancy . 3.1 Risk and risk assessment in pregnancy - do we scare because we care? Katja Stahl and Vanora Hundley 3.2 Reduced frequency prenatal visits in midwifery practice: attitudes and use Deborah S Walker, Stephanie Day, Corinne Diroff, Heather Lirette, Laura McCully, Candace Mooney-Hescott and Victoria Vest 3.3 Australian women's stories of their baby-feeding decisions in pregnancy Athena Sheehan, Virginia Schmied and Margaret Cooke 3.4 The Big Pregnancy Brain Mush Myth Sara Wickham 3.5 Body image and pregnancy Lorna Davies SECTION 4 Focus On . Building Communities of Women 4.1 Being used? Motive for user involvement Beverley A. Lawrence Beech 4.2 Powerful Sharing? Creating Effective User Groups Julie Wray 4.3 An evaluation of a support group for breast-feeding women in Salisbury, UK Jo Alexander, Tricia Anderson, Mandy grant, Jill Sanghera and Dawn Jackson 4.4 The Birth Resource Centre: A Community of Women Jane Crewe, Andrea St. Clair, Lyssa Clayton, Fiona Armstrong, Lee Seekings-Norman, Nadine Edwards and Sara Wickham SECTION 5 Labour and Birth 5.1 Current best evidence: A review of the literature on umbilical cord clamping Judith S. Mercer 5.2 Perineal trauma: prevention and treatment Rona McCandlish 5.3 A disappearing art: vaginal breech birth Becky Reed 5.4 Home Breech Birth Esther Culpin (Commentary by Michel Odent) 5.5 To drip or not to drip? A literature review Myra Parsons 5.6 Fetal blood sampling Penny Champion 5.7 Don't take it lying down! Gillian Fletcher 5.8 Going Backwards: the concept of 'pasmo' Ina May Gaskin SECTION 6 Focus On . Birth Centres 6.1 A 'cycle of empowerment': the enabling culture of birth centres Mavis Kirkham 6.2 'Home from home': the key to success Morwenna Davies, Shirley McDonald and Denise Austin 6.3 A compromise for change? Sara Wickham 6.4 Birth Centres in Wiltshire (1) Vicky Tinsley 6.5 Birth Centres in Wiltshire (2) Vicky Tinsley SECTION 7 Life After Birth 7.1 Postnatal Care: is it an afterthought? Julie Wray 7.2 A light in the fog: Caring for women with postpartum depression Holly Powell Kennedy, Cheryl Tatano Beck and Jeanne Watson Driscoll 7.3 Hands Off! The Breastfeeding Best Start Project (1) Sally Inch, Susan Law and Louise Wallace 7.4 Hands Off! The Breastfeeding Best Start Project (2) Sally Inch, Susan Law and Louise Wallace 7.5 'White blood': dose benefits of human milk Suzanne Colson 7.6 Mother and Baby - a Good Start Sarah J. Buckley SECTION 8 Focus on . Diversity (2) 8.1 Adolescent motherhood in an inner city who are in the UK: Experiences and needs of a group of adolescent mothers Maria Barrell 8.2 Why choose motherhood? The older teenage client's perspective Claire Beckinsale 8.3 Beating disability, embracing motherhood Simone Baker Pregnancy, labour and mothering among women who have suffered trauma Mindy Levy SECTION 9 Stories and Reflection 9.1 Creating a scene: the work of Progress Theatre Kirsten Baker 9.2 The Numbers Game Nicki Pusey 9.3 Kicking out the oboes Suzanne Colson 9.4 You can take a horse to water. Anon 9.5 Pushing the boundaries: independence in the NHS Lynn Walcott 9.6 Pushed to the limit Rosie Kacary 9.7 My birth story Andrea Wolahan with Virginia Howes 9.8 A wise birth revisited Penny Armstrong 9.9 Compare and contrast. three births in one day Anne Adamson 9.10 The Un-Peel Report Gill Walton 9.11 Goodbye, and thanks Jane Bowler Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it