MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1499009694 · doi:10.1109/aps.2005.1552248

Causal Parameter Extractions by Vector Fitting for Use in Time-domain Numerical Modeling

2005· article· en· W1499009694 on OpenAlexaff
Shuiping Luo, Zhizhang Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTime domainFrequency domainConvolution (computer science)WeightingComputer scienceAlgorithmDomain (mathematical analysis)Exponential functionRational functionCurve fittingRange (aeronautics)Applied mathematicsMathematicsMathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceMachine learningArtificial neural networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In time-domain modeling techniques, such as the finite-difference time-domain method, a lumped parameter electronic device, such as a transistor, is often treated as a black box represented by its time-domain network parameters. The parameters of most electronic devices are, however, often given in the frequency domain and in a limited frequency range. Therefore, they need to be transformed into the corresponding time-domain parameters for inclusion in time-domain modeling. The vector fitting technique is a robust coefficient extraction technique that circumvents the normal ill-conditioning and unbalanced weighting problems occurring in a rational approximation or fitting process. We apply it to obtain frequency domain rational approximation functions of network parameters of a lumped parameter device and then convert them to the corresponding time-domain parameters. As a result, the time-domain parameters are not only causal but also exponential in time. Convolution can then be performed in a recursive fashion without the need to involve a complete past history of the time-domain data. In a long simulation, the CPU time saving factor can be hundreds and thousands of times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionFrench-language works237,207