MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1499071429

The Slave Narrative Tradition in Lawrence Hill’sThe Book of Negroes

2010· article· en· W1499071429 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stephanie Yorke

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Canadian Literature · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeMythologyMemoirHistoryLiteratureArtSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lawrence Hill’s The Book of Negroes (2007) is an important revisionist work that simultaneously adheres to and undermines the slave narrative genre. Hill infuses the novel with an historical and generic intelligence that allows him to generally maintain the slave narrative story-form while undercutting those thematic features that have created racial mythologies, presenting a genuine fiction that “writes back” to the textual history of the slave narrative. For example, Hill’s narrator, Aminata Diallo, writes her memoir in the company of campaigning abolitionists who pressure her to make her story conform to both the pre-existing model and their manumission campaign. She complains of interference and chooses to set down her narrative independent of their leadership. Hill therefore circumvents the abolitionists’ partial censorship and simultaneously draws attention to it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Canadian LiteratureSame topicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207