Le contexte idéologique de Girart de Roussillon. Quelques remarques sur la partie finale du poème
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ideological background of many chansons de geste is still but little known. One of the most interesting texts from this point of view is the twelfth-century poem Girart de Roussillon, which praises ecclesiastical values such as pacifism and humility and even defends some very specific theological positions. This paper analyzes some aspects of the final part of the poem, such as the allusion to the legend of St. Bartholomew (which further corroborates the localization of the text in the Lyon region), the uncommon use which is made of this legend and which implies a rejection of extreme poverty and an acceptance of social constraints, as well as the stress laid on the construction of churches and on prayers for the dead. These concerns presuppose the reactions of the Church against the heretics of the first half of the twelfth century, Peter of Bruys and Henry of Lausanne. The necessity of fighting the latter’s movement (which was still virulent around the middle of the century) might very well be one of the reasons that induced the poet to write an epic in the local language.1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".