Radiodifusão: dispositivo intersetorial na produção de saúde
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo trata do cuidado intersetorial na saúde, sendo feito por usuários e trabalhadores participantes de um programa de rádio. A escrita volta-se às memórias dos programas ocorridos, buscando, nesse olhar para trás, um vigor para a discussão. Percorre-se toda uma trajetória de construção do cuidado, inspirado no modo de apresentação do programa de rádio. O artigo tem estrutura semelhante ao programa, contendo subtítulos iguais aos blocos do mesmo. Num primeiro momento apresentaremos o programa, onde está inserido e os atores vinculados. No bloco 1 resgataremos um pouco da história da Reforma Psiquiátrica e as relações com a PNH. No bloco 2 debateremos o cuidado em saúde intersetorial. O terceiro bloco serão memórias do Coletivo loucutor, as quais trarão para o texto pensamentos sobre o fazer radiofônico e o cuidado em saúde. Finalizaremos com as dicas do dia, assim como fazemos no último bloco do programa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".