KAJIAN KASUS BLBI: PENGGESERAN HUKUM PUBLIK KE DALAM LAPANGAN HUKUM PRIVAT
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We identify tendency where corruption cases are resolved under civil law provisions rather than criminal law. Apparently, UNCAC 2003, as ratified by Act 7/2006, is the basis for examining BLBI scandal under Inpres 8/2002 concerning ‘release and discharge’ policy. Examination of corruption crimes seems to embark on to private law aspects. Korupsi diberikan sarana penyelesaian sengketa melalui aspek hukum perdata (litigasi/non-litigasi). Hal ini sejalan dengan UNCAC 2003, yang diratifikasi dengan UU No. 7 Tahun 2006 yang menjadi landasan penyelesaian kasus BLBI melalui Inpres No. 8 Tahun 2002 tentang release and discharge. Terjadi pergeseran hukum pidana menjadi hukum perdata dalam menyelesaikan perkara korupsi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it