Drotrecogin alfa activated treatment in a neonate with sepsis and multi organ failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated) improves outcome in adult patients with severe sepsis. Since the published pediatric experience with this drug is limited, the role of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in children, and especially in newborns is not well established. We describe a 3-day-old neonate with septic shock and multiorgan system failure, including circulatory, respiratory, renal failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation, refractory to intensive fluid resuscitation and inotrope support. Within hours of drotrecogin alfa (activated) administration, the neonate experienced dramatic improvement in hemodynamic parameters. The infusion was discontinued after 48 hours, without clinical deterioration. Aside from transient thrombocytopenia, no significant side effects were observed. A brain MRI performed on day 18 after discontinuation of treatment was normal. The positive hemodynamic effect and outcome of treatment in this patient, indicates that drotrecogin alfa (activated) may play a similar role in the treatment of sepsis in neonates as already established in adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".