La théorie du capital et le renouveau du paradigme des tensions et des opportunités en criminologie sociologique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La théorie du capital social est devenue très populaire en sociologie contemporaine. On a cependant accordé beaucoup plusd’attention aux conséquences positives de l’accumulation de capital social qu’aux obstacles et aux échecs rencontrés par ceuxqui tentent d’accéder à de telles ressources et de les développer. S’inspirant du paradigme des tensions et des opportunités dela criminologie sociologique et voulant à étendre les études sur les jeunes des écoles aux jeunes qui vivent dans la rue, cetarticle veut montrer qu’une théorie du capital social de la criminalité peut élargir l’évantail explicatif de la criminologie contemporaine.Pour démontrer notre point, nous passons en revue notre propre recherche sur la criminalité et l’itinérance dejeunes de deux villes canadiennes. Nous montrons qu’une conception du capital social qui s’appuie sur l’anomie fournit uncadre théorique flexible pour explorer et expliquer les différences entre différents milieux d’un même pays et de pays différents.Les problèmes des jeunes de la rue et de la criminalité posent aux chercheurs une série de questions qui méritent uneattention internationale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".