<b>Jeremy R. Carrette</b>, <i>Foucault and Religion: Spiritual Corporality and Political Spirituality</i>, London and New York: Routledge Press, 2000
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Foucault and Religion, Carrette presents the reader with an impressive study in which he attempts to locate and unearth a 'religious question' running throughout the margins of Foucault's writings.This work acts as a corrective to writers who, in Carrette's opinion, unsuccessfully bring Christian theology into conversation with Foucauldian themes of mysticism, spiritualism, and the "unthought."The angle, then, from which Carrette approaches Foucault's 'religious question' is one that seeks to reposition traditional religious ontology into a non-binary "space of the body and the politics of the subject." 1 Drawing attention to Foucault's own suggestion in 1963 that there "may be a religious question" throughout his work Carrette argues that if such a question exists it is one that radically alters the "traditional contours in the philosophy of religion." 2 This remapping of religion eclipses the notion of a religious transcendence to one that is wholly immanent.The book is divided into seven chapters.Much like the introduction, the first chapter familiarizes the reader with Foucault's writings by giving an overview of his oeuvre.In this chapter Carrette traces some of the important thematic developments of the 'religious question' in Foucault's archaeological thinking (1954-69), genealogical work (1970-5), and explicit discussion of Christianity in the History of Sexuality (1976-84).It is in chapter two, however, where Carrette begins to substantiate the book's thesis.He writes: "In order to bring some coherence to these ideas I wish to hold these fragments [religious ideas] together by framing them within Foucault's discussion of 'the said as much as the unsaid.'" 3Carrette maps the "said" and "unsaid" around the two pillars confession and silence, respectively.Instead of conceptualizing the confession and silence as binary opposites he continues to write, "paradoxically, in a non-binary system Foucault's examination of the confession was also the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it