Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este trabajo se estudian las relaciones entre alexitimia y ajuste diadico en parejas. Para ello fueron evaluadas 72 parejas sin pa tologia fisica ni psiquica grave con la Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) y la Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Los varones con ale xitimia mostraron peor ajuste diadico y, en ambos esposos, la alexitimia predijo un peor ajuste de par eja. Estos resultados sugieren que la alexitimia deberia tenerse en cuenta en la ter apia de pareja. Alexithymia and couple relationships. In this article, the relationships between alexitimia and dyadic adjustment in couples are studied. 72 couples without ser ious physical or psychological pathology, were evaluated with the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and the Dyadic Adjustment Scale . The males with alexitimia showed worse dyadic adjustment and, in both spouses, alexitimia predicted a worse dyadic adjustment. This results suggest that alexitimia should be taken into account in the couple therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it