MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1500117002

SUSAN STRYKER, Transgender History

2010· article· en· W1500117002 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carrie Schmidt

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean history and politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransgenderHistoryPsychologyPsychoanalysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is an understatement to say that gender is complicated, but when the idea of transgenderism is introduced, notions of gender become utterly bewildering to many people.In her book Transgender History, Susan Stryker succinctly explains why transgender people are often treated with open disdain and disrespect in society: "Because most people have great difficulty recogniz ing the humanity of another person if they cannot recognize that person's gender, the gender-changing person can evoke in others a primordial fear of monstrosity, or loss of humanness" (p. 6).Indeed, there are strong male and female signifiers that humans are conditioned to recognize from a very early age, and we become confused when those signifiers are distorted.Facial hair?Male.High heels and breasts?Female.But what of the person with facial hair in heels?Assumptions about gender start at birth: "Congratulations!Boy or girl?"There is a strong social desire to immediately classify something new, and it begins with needing to know whether blue or pink blankets should be used, and if family and friends should start purchasing toy dolls or toy trucks.Gender assumptions and generalizations are difficult to get away from, and this is precisely what Stryker addresses: What is gender?What is sexual identity?The quick and dirty answer: it is complicated.As Stryker explains: "Because transgender issues touch on fundamental questions of human exist ence, they take us into areas that we rarely consider carefully" (p. 7).Transgender History is a compact, thorough introduction to modern transgender history, concentrating mainly on the United States (though European transgender history is also explored; the reader is duly informed that the first recorded "sex change" operations took place in Europe).The actual text is a relatively short 153 pages, divided into five chapters, and accompanied by a reader's guide, a wealth of suggested readings, detailed sources, and an index.The author's qualifications are impressive: Stryker has held positions at both

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0120.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueArchivariaSame topicEuropean history and politicsFrench-language works237,207