MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1500322657

A evolução dos bancos argentinos no último quartel do século XIX: a influência dos bancos estrangeiros e a crise dos anos noventa

2001· article· pt· W1500322657 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Heloísa Lenz

Bibliographic record

VenueEnsaios FEE · 2001
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Theory and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrencyQuarter (Canadian coin)Economic historyPeriod (music)Financial crisisPolitical scienceEconomyFinancial systemHistoryEconomicsKeynesian economicsArtArchaeologyMonetary economics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article aims to present a discussion on the evolution of Argentinian banking during the last quarter of the nineteenth century, a period known as the golden age of the export-led model. The work is divided into four parts. In the first one, it describes the evolution of the first financial institutions in Argentina, with emphasis on the creation of the Banco de Ia Provincia de Buenos Aires and of the Banco Nacional. In the second one it focuses on the first attempt to create a national currency in Argentina, where the case of Bancos Garantidos is important. The third one deals with the influence of private banks in Argentina, in which the Barings Brothers is the most famous player in the largest financial crisis in the period. The last part studies the banking crisis of the nineties and the Monetary Reform implemented in 1899.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnsaios FEESame topicEconomic Theory and PolicyFrench-language works237,207