Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lors d’une conférence, Rajeev Bhargava (2010) avançait que l’Inde pourrait servir de « modèle » aux pays occidentaux en matière de respect de la diversité religieuse. Il s’appuyait sur ce qui fait la spécificité de l’Inde, soit le fait que la diversité intra- et interreligieuse constitue le fondement même du sécularisme indien. Mais qu’en est-il dans les faits? En prenant le cas de la presse québécoise, j’ai voulu examiner ce qu’une partie de l’Occident « voit » lorsqu’elle tourne son regard vers l’Inde. Quels événements attirent son attention et comment sont-ils traités? Ce traitement est-il révélateur d’une certaine perception « occidentale » de l’Inde? Fait-il écho à la situation au Québec? Et, au-delà de toutes ces interrogations, est-il pertinent de parler de « modèle »?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".