MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1500460428 · doi:10.1002/9781118906170.ch9

The Response of Riparian Vegetation to Flow Regulation Along Peace River, Alberta

2014· other· en· W1500460428 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael Church, Lars Uunila, Margaret E. A. North

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersJohnson and Johnson
KeywordsRiparian zoneEcological successionVegetation (pathology)ShrubTaigaRiparian forestPeriod (music)ErosionBorealHydrology (agriculture)Stage (stratigraphy)Physical geographyGeographyEcologyGeologyForestryHabitatArchaeologyGeomorphologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: In the Alberta reach of Peace River, vegetation has been mapped from air photography at six epochs since the early 1950s. The river traverses the dry Aspen–Poplar biogeoclimatic zone and northern boreal forest. Communities were identified by air photo texture and vegetation morphology; apart from reconnaissance studies, no ground investigations were undertaken. Temporal changes record the widespread establishment, after regulation, of pioneer herb and shrub communities on exposed river bars. Over time, some have progressed to early forest stands dominated mainly by cottonwood (Populus balsamifera). However, at many sites, development has remained at the pioneer shrub stage, the result of winter high water and ice effects. In the reach downstream of the Town of Peace River, ice activity has severely limited vegetation succession. On stable terrestrial sites, normal succession is observed. However, the spatial pattern of communities is palimpsestic, recording the effect of river lateral erosion and movement which brings pioneer communities into juxtaposition with well-established, late succession forest sites. The main effects of river lateral erosion probably originated in the pre-regulation period; however, 40 years of regulated flows are not sufficient for succession to overcome this legacy effect. Observations are broadly congruent with those in the proximal British Columbia reach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→