CoDBR: Cooperative Depth Based Routing for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mission critical applications impose the requirements of reliability and network efficiency on Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSN). Innovative routing solutions are therefore required for efficient data forwarding. In this paper, we propose a cooperative routing scheme for UWSNs to enhance network performance. Many cooperative communication protocols are developed investigating physical and MAC layer aspects to improve link efficiency in harsh underwater environment, however, at network layer, it is still largely unexplored. In this paper, Cooperation is employed at network layer in existing non-cooperative routing protocol, Depth Based Routing (DBR), to increase its reliability and throughput. Potential relays are selected on the basis of depth information. Data from source node is cooperatively forwarded to the destination by relay nodes. The simulation results show that CoDBR gives 83% more throughput, 98% more packet acceptance ratio and 90 % less packet drop in the stable region as compared to non-cooperative scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it