Écrire en tant qu'homme. Lévinas et la phénoménologie de l'Éros
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le féminin joue dans l’œuvre de Lévinas un rôle crucial, puisque, rencontré d’abord dans la relation érotique, il brise le cercle du même et l’ouvre à la dimension salutaire de la transcendance. Cependant, si certain-es ont estimé que par là Lévinas rompait avec le phallogocentrisme, dans une veine beauvoirienne Stella Sandford montre à quel point il demeure masculiniste. Sans témoigner d’aucune distance critique, Lévinas associe le féminin à l’ambiguïté de l’éros, à la différence sexuelle et le pose comme l’autre à la fois « inviolable » et quasi animal, irresponsable ou enfantin d’un sujet qui ne se pense jamais qu’au masculin. La critique de Beauvoir était donc pertinente et le Derrida de « Violence et métaphysique » aurait mieux fait de se demander quel homme tenait la plume de Lévinas lorsqu’il écrivait, plutôt que se réjouir de ce qu’il écrivît en tant qu’homme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".