MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1500653670

Race, Employment Discrimination, and State Complicity in Wartime Canada, 1939-1945

2007· article· en· W1500653670 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Carmela Patrias

Bibliographic record

VenueLabour / Le Travail · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComplicityRacismPolitical scienceState (computer science)CommunismEthnic groupWorkforceWorld War IISociologyGender studiesLawPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study that the crisis of war reinforced pre-existing social and economic inequality based on racist views and practices. War-induced anxieties intensified suspicion of “foreigners” — a term which encompassed large numbers of Canadian-born and naturalized people of Japanese, central, eastern, and southern European descent and Jews — as unpatriotic, disloyal, radical, and incapable of becoming truly Canadian. The war also brought sharply into focus and even intensified racist assumptions that African Canadians, eastern and southern Europeans, and Native people were suitable only for menial jobs; that Jewish, Chinese, and Japanese Canadians were economically aggressive; and that Jews in particular were given to shady practices. Such racist stereotypes in turn legitimized the ongoing marginalization of these minorities in the workforce. The state colluded in racist practices. To be sure not all state officials or all Canadians were racist, but the pragmatism that informed official complicity with employment discrimination underscores the pervasiveness of racism in wartime Canada. State officials — some of whom held racist ideas — were willing to accept employers’ and workers’ racist preferences because they believed that to do otherwise would create social unrest and disrupt war industries. Moreover, officials found that the relegation of minority groups such as Chinese Canadians, Japanese Canadians, and Native people to menial work offered the important benefit of filling jobs that Canadians with wider options avoided. Resume L’etude montre que la crise entrainee par la guerre a renforce l’inegalite sociale et economique existante basee sur les opinions et les pratiques racistes. Les anxietes provoquees par la guerre ont en effet intensifie la suspicion des « etrangers » — un terme qui englobe un grand nombre de personnes nees au Canada ou naturalisees, d’origine japonaise, europeenne (du centre, de l’est ou du sud) et juive. Ces indidious ont ete percus comme peu patriotiques, deloyaux, radicaux et incapables de devenir de vrais Canadiens. La guerre a brusquement ravive et meme intensifie les prejuges racistes que les Canadiens d’origine africaine, europeenne (de l’est et du sud) et les Autochtones ne convenaient pas aux travaux manuels; que lesCanadiens d’origine juive, chinoise et japonaise etaient economiquement agressifs; et que les juifs en particulier s’adonnaient aux pratiques louches. De tels stereotypes racistes, a leur tour, ont rendu legitime la marginalisation permanente de ces minorites dans le monde du travail. L’Etat a contribue aux pratiques racistes. Il est certain que tous les representants de l’Etat et tous les Canadiens n’etaient pas racistes. Mais la discrimination en matiere d’emploi et la complicite des autorites a cet effet soulignent l’omnipresence du racisme au Canada pendant la guerre. Les representants de l’Etat — certains d’entre eux avaient des idees racistes — etaient prets a accepter les preferences racistes des employeurs et des travailleurs car ils avaient peur de provoquer des troubles sociaux et d’interrompre la production des industries de guerre. De plus, les representants se sont rendus compte que la relegation aux travaux manuels des groupes minoritaires, tels que les Canadiens d’origine chinoise et japonaise et les Autochtones, offrirait l’important avantage de combler les emplois que les Canadiens evitaient parce qu’ils avaient plus d’options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLabour / Le TravailSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207