AVALIAÇÃO DO DISPOSITIVO DE FORMAÇÃO CONTÍNUA DOS PROFESSORES DAS ESCOLAS FUNDAMENTAIS DO MALI: O CASO DAS COMUNIDADES DE APRENDIZAGEM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo apresenta o processo de avaliação de um disposi-tivo de formação posto em prática no Mali, destinado a aperfeiçoar o ensino-aprendizagem nas escolas de ensino fundamental do país. O Ministério de Educação do Mali havia escolhido um modelo particular de formação contínua de professores, denominado Comunidades de Aprendizagem de Professores (CA). Após mais de três anos de funcionamento do modelo, uma avaliação do dispositivo foi realizada pelo autor principal deste artigo.Esta avaliação visava aos seguintes objetivos: fornecer às pessoas interessadas as informações necessárias, permitindo a tomada de decisão quanto a possíveis correções;formar avaliadores locais capazes de conduzir, de maneira periódica, a avaliação dessedispositivo de formação.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".