MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1500681201 · doi:10.7202/032692ar

Age of Pre-Neoglacial Cirque Moraines in the Central North American Cordillera

2007· article· en· W1500681201 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
P. Thompson Davis, Gerald Osborn

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie physique et Quaternaire · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoraineCirqueGeologyRadiocarbon datingHolocenePleistocenePhysical geographyGlacierRange (aeronautics)PaleontologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the western mountains of the United States and Canada are pre-Neoglacial cirque moraines that lie up to about 3 km outside Neoglacial moraines. There is considerable uncertainty as to the ages of the outer moraines and whether or not they are age-equivalent from range to range. The variety of assigned radiocarbon ages found in the literature may be partly due to some authors' use of minimum-limiting dates as near-absolute dates, and use of dates that cannot be definitely related to the deposits in question. With one possible exception, all the dated moraines described in the literature could be as old as the type Temple Lake moraine of Wyoming which has a minimum age of about 11,400 yrs BP based on a recently obtained radiocarbon date. Nearly all paleoecological proxy data from the North American Cordillera, generally derived from continuous sedimentary records, suggest that early Holocene climate was warmer than at present. Global circulation models also suggest an early Holocene thermal maximum in the Cordillera, probably due to Milankovitch forcing. For these reasons a proposal gaining popularity in the literature that widespread "Mesoglaciation" occurred in early Holocene time is premature. We hypothesize that most, if not all, of the moraines in question are correlative and date from Late Pleistocene time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie physique et QuaternaireSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207