MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1500857627 · doi:10.1177/070674370505000617

Book Review: Transcultural Psychiatry: Revenge of the Windigo. The Construction of the Mind and Mental Health of North American Aboriginal People

2005· article· en· W1500857627 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
F. Engelsmann

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Mental healthMonsterSociologyPsychologyPsychoanalysisCriminologyHistoryPsychiatryArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transcultural Psychiatry Revenge of the Windigo. The Construction of the Mind and Mental Health of North American Aboriginal People. James B Waldram. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2004. 414 p. CANS29.95. Reviewer rating: Very good. JB Waldram, a medical anthropologist and professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Saskatchewan, spent considerable time in Algonkian communities in Northern Canada, where he heard stories of the windigo, the cannibal monster. In this book, he presents a remarkable critical review of studies of North American Aboriginal people. He tries to show how 3 disciplinesanthropology, psychology, and psychiatrycreated and distorted our image of Aboriginal people. The author does not offer new data but, rather, points out the problems scholars and researchers have encountered with concepts, methods, and theories-problems that have led to questionable conclusions and generalizations often devoid of historical and social context. The book has 12 chapters divided into 3 parts. The first part reviews efforts in the first half of the 20th century to identify basic Aboriginal personality structure; it discusses classic approaches by anthropologists such as Ruth Benedict and her contemporaries, who were influenced by the pioneering work of Franz Boas. Their projects aimed to preserve the vanishing North American Aboriginal cultures and explore their patterns. Benedict's work is criticized for omissions or selective use of nonconforming data, for example, in regard to violence and alcohol abuse (p 25). Waldram concludes that Benedict's classic examination was fundamentally flawed (p 26). He describes the emergence of psychoanalytical anthropology and the influence of Sigmund Freud's evolutionary ideas that sought parallels between primitive people and neurotic behaviour. Culture-andpersonality studies came under attack by the middle of the 20th century, however, with new interest in the trait list approach to personality and problems of acculturation. One of the most documented efforts to focus on the psychological consequences of acculturation was the Indian Education and Administration Research Project, initiated in 1941 at the University of Chicago. This interdisciplinary project aimed to improve Indian schooling and administration. It involved some 50 eminent scientists and used standardized psychological tests such as the Rorschach, Thematic Apperception Test, Goodenough Draw-A-Man, Wechsler Intelligence Scales, and other methods. The tests might have failed to measure Native intelligence, but they helped to refine crosscultural techniques. Some of the monographs produced became ethnographic classics, although cautionary notes warned readers not to overgeneralize. The project was a testing ground for cooperation among anthropologists, psychologists, and psychoanalytic psychiatrists. Anthropologists persevered in their use of tests and generated psychological profiles for many different Aboriginal North American groups. Rorschach was useful for cross-cultural comparison, although some results were too general or vague to be of value. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) was also widely used, but acculturation and socioeconomic status-especially education or occupation-affected scores on the abbreviated MMPI 168-item scale. Psychometric approaches to the study of personality and intelligence attempted to capture the essence of the Aboriginal in terms of a few items and scale scores used to differentiate among groups and cultures-but whatever culture is, it is certainly not simply a variable (p 101). The second part of the book examines both early and contemporary studies of Aboriginal psychopathology, with specific attention to concepts of acculturative stress. Some early acculturation studies held the view that Utopian, genuine, internally harmonious Aboriginal cultures existed before the arrival of Europeans. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry→Same topicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology→French-language works237,207→