MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1500859847 · doi:10.37236/826

New Infinite Families of Almost-Planar Crossing-Critical Graphs

2008· article· en· W1500859847 on OpenAlex
Petr Hliněný

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Electronic Journal of Combinatorics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBanff International Research Station for Mathematical Innovation and Discovery
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsDegree (music)Planar graphChordal graph1-planar graphPlanarIndifference graphSimple (philosophy)Crossing number (knot theory)Clique-sumDiscrete mathematicsGraphComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that, for all choices of integers $k>2$ and $m$, there are simple $3$-connected $k$-crossing-critical graphs containing more than $m$ vertices of each even degree $\leq2k-2$. This construction answers one half of a question raised by Bokal, while the other half asking analogously about vertices of odd degrees at least $7$ in crossing-critical graphs remains open. Furthermore, our newly constructed graphs have several other interesting properties; for instance, they are almost planar and their average degree can attain any rational value in the interval $\big[3+{1\over5},6-{8\over k+1}\big)$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it