Les politiques sur l'intégration des TIC au Canada et l'utilisation des ressources pédagogiques numériques chez les enseignants francophones : un constat de doubles inégalités
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pour les enseignants francophones du Canada, les ressources pedagogiques numeriques en langue francaise s’averent essentielles afin de les aider a atteindre les objectifs et les competences des programmes d’etudes des divers curricula. Si ces ressources peuvent s’averer utiles, elles posent toutefois de grands defis aux enseignants, soit d’integrer leur utilisation a la pratique enseignante. A cet effet, une recension exhaustive des politiques gouvernementales et ministerielles en vigueur au Canada sur l’integration des TIC a ete realisee. A la lecture de ces politiques, nous constatons qu’elles sont le reflet de doubles inegalites. Ces inegalites se refletent a divers plans et ont une incidence profonde sur la frequence des pratiques d’integration chez les enseignants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".