Visualizing Auditory Spatial Imagery of Multi-channel Audio
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To describe a multichannel audio experience in terms of its spatial features requires us to consider sound imagery in terms of precedent sound. We mean precedent sound to be that part of a phantom sound image that contains spatial information about the virtual sound source. We have developed and tested a Graphical User Interface (GUI) to allow a listener to describe where they hear both precedent and environment-related sound in an audio scene. The GUI has previously been used as a tool for describing where we hear the precedent sound in two-channel sound reproduction, and we now extend the experimental paradigm to investigate phantom imagery for a multichannel loudspeaker arrangement. We present a category system for describing the spatial sound attribute “definition”, and have tested the GUI using 5 loudspeakers arranged according to BS-775 to replay multi-channel sound recordings of three different musical pieces (two duets and one solo). Graduate Tonmeister students used the GUI to describe these sound scenes, and a variety of statistical analyses are used to visualize auditory spatial imagery. USHER AND WOSZCZYK VISUALIZING AUDITORY SPATIAL IMAGERY
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it