MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1501281527 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2001.940214

Blind source separation of convolved sources by joint approximate diagonalization of cross-spectral density matrices

2002· article· en· W1501281527 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlind signal separationAlgorithmScalingSpectral densityMathematicsComputer scienceMatrix (chemical analysis)Permutation (music)Applied mathematicsChannel (broadcasting)Statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new method for separating non-stationary sources from their convolutive mixtures based on approximate joint diagonalization of the observed signals' cross-spectral density matrices. Several blind source separation (BSS) algorithms have been proposed which use approximate joint diagonalization of a set of scalar matrices to estimate the instantaneous mixing matrix. We extend the concept of approximate joint diagonalization to estimate MIMO FIR channels. Based on this estimate we then design a separating network which will recover the original sources up to only a permutation and scaling ambiguity for minimum phase channels. We eliminate the commonly experienced problem of arbitrary scaling and permutation at each frequency bin, by optimizing the cost function directly with respect to the time-domain channel variables. We demonstrate the performance of the algorithm by computer simulations using real speech data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207