MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Guaiacol and 4-methylguaiacol accumulate in wines made from smoke-affected fruit because of hydrolysis of their conjugates

2011· article· en· W1501361174 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Davinder Pal Singh, Hui H. Chong, K.M. PITT, Michael Cleary, Nick Dokoozlian, Mark O. Downey

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of Grape and Wine Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFogarty International CenterAlberta Water Research Institute
KeywordsGuaiacolWineChemistryFood scienceHydrolysisAcid hydrolysisWinemakingChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims: Taint in smoke-exposed grapes have been associated with elevated levels of guaiacol and 4-methylguaiacol. Previous research has reported guaiacol and 4-methylguaiacol in both fruits and wines. In some cases, these compounds were not detected, or were detected at low levels in the fruit while high levels were subsequently identified during or after winemaking. Later research indicated that this was due to the presence of glycosidic conjugates. Here we report a method for the routine analysis of guaiacol and 4-methylguaiacol released after acid hydrolysis of glycoside precursors. Methods and Results: Chardonnay, Merlot, Shiraz, Sangiovese and Cabernet Sauvignon fruits were collected following bushfire events in 2006–2007 in the King Valley wine region of NE Victoria, Australia. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to detect free guaiacol and 4-methylguaiacol in both fruits and wines. Low levels of free and bound forms were present in fruit not exposed to smoke. Substantial levels of free guaiacol and 4-methylguaiacol were detected in the wines made from the smoke-affected fruits. These compounds increased during bottle storage. Acid hydrolysis of wines and berries resulted in a several-fold increase in free guaiacol and 4-methylguaiacol. Conclusions: The validated GC-MS method is suitable for monitoring free and glycosidically bound guaiacol and 4-methylguaiacol after acid hydrolysis in both fruits and wines. Acid hydrolysis of wines provided evidence that bound volatiles, most probably glycosidically, act as reserve for guaiacol and 4-methylguaiacol, which are released during ageing of wines. Significance of the Study: This is the first study published in a refereed journal to demonstrate that smoke taint-associated volatiles increase during ageing of wine and bound forms of guaiacol and 4-methylguaiacol represent an aroma reserve for smoke taint in ageing/bottled wines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Journal of Grape and Wine ResearchSame topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207