MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1501436306 · doi:10.1007/3-7643-7514-0

Pseudo-Differential Operators and Related Topics

2006· book· en· W1501436306 on OpenAlexaff
Paolo Boggiatto, Joachim Toft, Luigi Rodino

Bibliographic record

VenueBirkhäuser Basel eBooks · 2006
Typebook
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDifferential (mechanical device)Computer scienceMathematicsEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strongly Elliptic Second Order Systems with Spectral Parameter in Transmission Conditions on a Nonclosed Surface.- Well-Posedness of the Cauchy Problem for Some Degenerate Hyperbolic Operators.- Quasilinear Hyperbolic Equations with SG-Coefficients.- Representation of Solutions and Regularity Properties for Weakly Hyperbolic Systems.- Global Calculus of Fourier Integral Operators, Weighted Estimates, and Applications to Global Analysis of Hyperbolic Equations.- Lp-Continuity for Pseudo-Differential Operators.- Fredholm Property of Pseudo-Differential Operators on Weighted Holder-Zygmund Spaces.- Weyl Transforms and Convolution Operators on the Heisenberg Group.- Uncertainty Principle, Phase Space Ellipsoids and Weyl Calculus.- Pseudo-Differential Operator and Reproducing Kernels Arising in Geometric Quantization.- Hudson's Theorem and Rank One Operators in Weyl Calculus.- Distributions and Pseudo-Differential Operators on Infinite-Dimensional Spaces with Applications in Quantum Physics.- Ultradistributions and Time-Frequency Analysis.- Frames and Generalized Shift-Invariant Systems.- The Wigner Distribution of Gaussian Weakly Harmonizable Stochastic Processes.- Reproducing Groups for the Metaplectic Representation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBirkhäuser Basel eBooksSame topicMathematical Analysis and Transform MethodsFrench-language works237,207