MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1501604993

Gender, Race, and Nation: A Global Perspective

2003· article· en· W1501604993 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen’s Studies Quarterly · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Politics and Representation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGender studiesPerspective (graphical)SociologyRace (biology)Diversity (politics)IntersectionalityAnthropology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gender, Race, and Nation: A Global Perspective, edited by Vanaja Dhruvarajan and Jill Vickers (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002) As Vanaja Dhruvarajan, Jill Vickers, and three contributing authors make clear in Gender, Race and Nation: A Global Perspective, the field of gender studies has changed dramatically over the last two decades. The authors contributing to this edited volume devote substantial time to targeting Western feminist studies for fostering narrow, homogeneous conceptions of gender. Gender as studied in the past centered on a perspective assuming common interests and feminist goals while ignoring the multiplicity of voices and experiences of women around the world. Today, as the authors emphasize, it is vital not only to understand the differences that exist among women but also to acknowledge the types of hierarchies that are built into institutional structures and perpetuate and legitimate inequalities for women in their various contexts and locations. The authors seek to use the study of difference as a source of learning and understanding and as a point of challenge from which to unlock assumptions concerning experiences and histories in order to move progressively forward toward a more diverse and inclusive view of women and their lives. The chapters expand and confront the way gender is studied by offering a one-world theoretical perspective from which to study gender. Although this might sound like a paradoxical approach for the study of diversity, the one-world framework used throughout the text challenges former generalizations surrounding women and seeks to make the diverse lives of women the focus, while integrating the connections between race and nation and gender. The book draws attention to Amrita Basu's work (1995) highlighting how women's within and across nations are shaped by a complex amalgam of national, racial, religious, ethnic, class and sexual identities (4). The one-world approach, therefore, represents a much-needed paradigm shift, challenging past scholarly tendencies to singularize movements and activities. The authors in this volume contribute to Chandra Mohanty's (1991) critique of mainstream feminist scholarship by calling upon scholars and practitioners conducting empirical research on gender to break down the universal and show the heterogeneity of women, to move beyond categories predicated as natural, and to understand the categories of difference as relational. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it