Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les classes moyennes sont-elles en déclin au sein de la société québécoise ? Quatre indicateurs caractérisant le statut socioéconomique des ménages sont examinés afin de répondre à cette question. La thèse du déclin n’est pas confirmée pour la période 1982-2008, bien que les classes moyennes aient eu plus de difficulté à maintenir leur rang à partir des seuls revenus de marché. Les chances d’accès aux classes moyennes, associées à différentes caractéristiques comme l’âge, la scolarité ou la présence d’enfants, sont restées bonnes mais la composition de ces dernières a profondément changé au fil des ans. On y retrouve moins de jeunes ménages, moins de ménages avec enfant présent, plus de retraités et davantage de personnes plus scolarisées. La mutation des classes moyennes reflètent donc les changements structuraux qui ont marqué le Québec dans le dernier tiers du XX e siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".