MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W150177138 · doi:10.4000/critiquedart.13769

Abraham Poincheval : l'épaisseur de la montagne

2013· article· fr· W150177138 on OpenAlexaff
Léa Ahrweiller

Bibliographic record

VenueCritique d’art · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Montagne
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A travers ce récit divisé en quatre chapitres correspondant à chacune des saisons de l'année, Abraham Poincheval livre le récit poétique de sa déambulation entre Digne et Caraglio du 14 juillet 2011 au 5 mai 2012. Il intitule cette aventure : Gyrovague, le voyage invisible,du nom de ce curieux engin cylindrique que l'artiste pousse devant de lui tout au long de son périple. Ce véhicule atypique lui sert d'abri pour la nuit mais aussi de camera obscura grâce à une petite ouverture circulaire ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.011
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritique d’artSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207