MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1502043085 · doi:10.21723/riaee.v1i2.447

Análise de práticas educativas no ensino de física: um estudo com alunos do ensino médio da rede pública de são paulo

2007· article· pt· W1502043085 on OpenAlex
Nonato Assis de Miranda, Dirceu da Silva, Fernanda Oliveira Simon, Estéfano Vizconde Veraszto

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação · 2007
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience and Education Research
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

este trabalho apresenta os resultados de uma pesquisa realizada com alunos do ensino médio da rede pública de São Paulo para analisar o funcionamento psico-social da sala de aula na disciplina de Física. Para tanto, utilizou-se de instrumento tipo escala de Likert desenvolvido por pesquisadores australianos e modificado por pesquisadores portugueses. Os dados foram analisados pelo método estatístico VARIMAX, no qual os fatores obtidos favoreceram a interpretação das possíveis correlações entre as concepções apresentadas no instrumento de medida. Os resultados apontam que os alunos têm concepção positiva da sala de aula e que apesar das dificuldades enfrentas se propõem ao aprendizado da disciplina

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it