MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1502147982 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2015.7129418

Downlink cell association for large-scale MIMO HetNets employing small cell wireless backhaul

2015· article· en· W1502147982 on OpenAlexaff
Ning Wang, Ekram Hossain, Vijay K. Bhargava

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackhaul (telecommunications)Computer scienceComputer networkBase stationHeterogeneous networkWirelessMIMOTelecommunications linkWireless networkTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Downlink cell association (CA) is studied for cellular heterogeneous networks (HetNets) where large-scale antenna array is implemented at the macro base station (BS), while the opportunistically deployed small cells are single-antenna nodes, and they rely on over-the-air links to the macro base station for backhaul. The coupling constraint due to in-band wireless backhaul becomes another key criterion for cell association. A duplex and spectrum sharing scheme based on reverse timedivision duplex (TDD) is considered for interference management in the HetNet under the wireless backhaul constraint. A sum logarithmic-throughput maximization problem is formulated to balance throughput and fairness. By relaxing the binary cell association indicator variables, the optimization problem is shown to be a convex problem. Dual decomposition for relaxed optimization is employed to solve the integer nonlinear CA problem, which results in a distributed CA algorithm. Improved performance and fairness are achieved with the proposed algorithm under the wireless backhaul constraint, and more small cells implemented within the macro cell range achieves better load balancing. As no additional radio frequency hardware is required by the proposed scheme, it allows low-cost and fast implementation of wireless backhaul enabled cellular HetNets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.895

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207