MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1502159770

Receiver design for wireless optical MIMO channels with magnification

2009· article· en· W1502159770 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Telecommunications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBinMIMOChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringRadio receiver designInterference (communication)Equalization (audio)MagnificationWirelessFrequency domainBit error rateTelecommunicationsAlgorithmEngineeringTransmitterArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, receiver design for wireless optical MIMO channels with magnification is considered. The work done in this paper constitute a step towards the practical implementation of such links, since it is the first time the effects of spatial transformations are considered. Signal magnification introduces varying spatial frequency inter-channel interference (SF-ICI) at the receiver. A novel receiver design that uses complex windowing with decision feedback equalization is used to equalize the SF-ICI in spatial frequency domain. For SF-ICI limited channels, the novel receiver design achieved a low bit-error rate (BER) compared with rectangular windowing with bin-by-bin detection. However, for noise limited channels, rectangular windowing with bin-by-bin detections is the receiver design of choice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it