MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1502190774 · doi:10.1007/3-540-40996-3_32

Deterministic Broadcasting Time with Partial Knowledge of the Network

2000· book-chapter· en· W1502190774 on OpenAlexaff
Gianluca De Marco, Andrzej Pelc

Bibliographic record

VenueLecture notes in computer science · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadcasting (networking)Computer scienceNode (physics)RADIUSComputer networkPoint-to-pointNetwork topologyGraphPoint (geometry)Theoretical computer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmMathematicsCombinatoricsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the time of deterministic broadcasting in networks whose nodes have limited knowledge of network topology. Each node v knows only the part of the network within knowledge radius r from it, i.e., it knows the graph induced by all nodes at distance at most r from v . Apart from that, each node knows only the maximum degree Δ of the network and the number n of nodes. One node of the network, called the source , has a message which has to reach all other nodes. We adopt the widely studied communication model called the one-way model in which, in every round, each node can communicate with at most one neighbor, and in each pair of nodes communicating in a given round, one can only send a message while the other can only receive it. This is the weakest of all store-and-forward models for point-to-point networks, and hence our algorithms work for other models as well in at most the same time. We show tradeoffs between knowledge radius and time of deterministic broadcasting, when knowledge radius is small, i.e., when nodes are only aware of their close vicinity. While for knowledge radius 0, minimum broadcasting time is θ(e), where e is the number of edges in the network, broadcasting can be usually completed faster for positive knowledge radius. Our main results concern knowledge radii 1 and 2. We develop fast broadcasting algorithms and analyze their execution time. We also prove lower bounds on broadcasting time, showing that our algorithms are close to optimal, for a given knowledge radius. For knowledge radius 1 we develop a broadcasting algorithm working in time O (min( n , D 2 Δ)), where n is the number of nodes, D is the diameter of the network, and Δ is the maximum degree. We show that for bounded maximum degree Δ this algorithm is asymptotically optimal. For knowledge radius 2 we show how to broadcast in time O ( D Δ log n )) and prove a lower bound Ω( D Δ) on broadcasting time, when D Δ ∈ O ( n ). This lower bound is valid for any constant knowledge radius. For knowledge radius log * n+3 we show how to broadcast in time O ( D Δ). Finally, for any knowledge radius r , we show a broadcasting algorithm working in time O ( D 2 Δ/ r ). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.008
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLecture notes in computer scienceSame topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207