MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1502282318 · doi:10.15760/mem.36

Report on the Oregon Ballast Water Management Program in 2004

2004· report· en· W1502282318 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kirsten Flynn, Mark D. Sytsma

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Ecology and Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMaritime AdministrationCalifornia Department of Fish and WildlifeU.S. Geological SurveyU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceNorwegian Biodiversity Information CentreNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftSmithsonian Environmental Research CenterTransport CanadaGlobal Environment FacilityPortland State UniversityMassachusetts Department of Fish and GameCalifornia State Water Resources Control BoardU.S. Department of Homeland SecurityWashington Department of Fish and WildlifeUnited Nations Development ProgrammeU.S. Department of TransportationSmithsonian Institution
KeywordsBallastLegislatureSession (web analytics)Task forceEnvironmental scienceWater dischargeTask (project management)EngineeringBusinessGeologyOceanographyGeographyArchaeologyPolitical sciencePublic administrationGeotechnical engineeringAdvertisingSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report was prepared for the Oregon legislature pursuant to HB 3620, which was passed during the 2003 session of the Oregon legislature to address management of ballast water discharged from ships. The bill removed sediment from the definition of ballast water, allowed discharge of treated ballast water, created a task force on ballast water management, and required this report. Includes List of Acronyms, charts, graphs and maps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207