MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1502318089 · doi:10.7202/001538ar

L’expérience de l’infertilité féminine vécue sous assistance médicale

2002· article· fr· W1502318089 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Françoise-Romaine Ouellette

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologie et sociétés · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le point de vue qu'ont sur leur expérience les femmes dites infertiles doit être pris en considération dans le débat sur les nouvelles technologies de la reproduction. Une recherche réalisée pour le Conseil du statut de la femme auprès de 32 Québécoises suivies en clinique de fertilité, aide à comprendre pourquoi elles adhèrent à la «solution» médicale malgré les difficultés et les risques sérieux qu'elle comporte souvent. Tant l'approche bio-médicale de l'infertilité que le contexte social et culturel dans lequel elles évoluent tendent à définir le recours aux techniques de procréation assistée comme la seule alternative d'action possible pour elles, et rendent extrêmement difficile toute remise en question du processus d'aide médicale une fois qu'il est amorcé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.253
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociologie et sociétésSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207