Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anti-corrosion protective coatings have been widely applied as a surface treatment to prevent corrosion ofvarious metallic materials, such as aluminum alloys, magnesium alloys, steel and zinc-coated steel, which areused in automobile parts, building structures, home appliances, etc. One of the most important characteristics ofthese coatings is the ability to self-heal. If a self-healing coating suffers mechanical damage and corrosivespecies in the environment begin to degrade the bare metal surface, the damaged surface is automaticallyrepaired by a chemical component of the coating. Chromate conversion coatings have self-healing properties.However, environmental concerns have necessitated the reduction and discontinuation of chromate-basedprotective coatings in recent years. This paper describes two recently developed self-healing coatings — afluorine polymer coating with metal particles and a coating comprised of particles and an organic healing agent.A fluorine polymer coating has self-healing properties, which are improved by the addition of metal particles. Aself-healing coating that uses particles and an organic healing agent has also been developed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".