Asynchronous regional brain volume losses in presymptomatic to moderate AD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To determine if rates and locations of brain volume loss associated with AD are phase-specific, occurring prior to clinical onset and at later stages, we performed longitudinal volumetric MRI analysis on 155 subjects enrolled in a prospective study of aging and dementia. Subjects were divided by Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale into stages of Normal (CDR 0 --> 0), Very Mild (CDR 0 --> 0.5 and 0.5 --> 0.5), Mild (CDR 0.5 --> 1.0 and 1.0 --> 1.0) and Moderate (CDR 1.0 --> 2.0 and 2.0 --> 2.0) dementia. Rates of volume change in CSF spaces, lobar and medial temporal lobe regions were analyzed for group differences across stages. Annual rates of ventricular volume change differed between non-demented and very mild group (p<0.01). In later severity stages, ventricular, temporal, basal ganglia-thalamic region and total volumes show change. Rates of volume loss increase as dementia progresses, but not uniformly in all regions. These regional and phase-specific volume changes form targets for monitoring disease-modifying therapies at clinically relevant, defined stages of dementia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".